Government Regulation Of Monopolies-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Explain how and Why Governments May Want to Regulate the Price Setting Of a Natural Monopoly. Answer: Introduction A monopoly arising out of high fixed costs or start up costs is termed as a natural monopoly. An industry where natural monopoly persists requires unique raw material, specialized technology and other factors which are necessary to operate. The government run public services such as water; electricity and telecommunications are most common examples of Natural monopoly. Generally natural monopolies tend to have high infrastructure cost(Haworth). The concept of Natural monopoly was characterized by John Stuart Mill, who was of the opinion that prices would throw back the cost of production in lack of natural monopoly. In order to have good return on investment it has to acquire a large number of customers. Therefore it is stated that industries which bear high start up cost tend to have low average cost because with huge amount of customers, the output tends to increase(Crugman, Version 7). Let us explain the natural monopoly situation with the help of an example: Demand P = 120-Q Marginal Revenue MR = 120-2Q Average cost AC = 15+ (400/Q) Marginal Cost MC = 15 The average cost has a direct relationship with Marginal cost, because as the AC increases MC tends to remain below the AC. In a natural monopoly AC tends to decline with increasing quantity of output(J, 2012). In the above example if the monopolist is allowed to set its own price and output, then the condition implied would be MR=MC 120-2Q = 15 i.e. Q = 52.5 P = 120-52.5 = 67.5 With the increase in elasticity of demand the monopolistic prices can be broken down. The competitors tend to increase the demand elasticity which implies that if prices are increased part of your demand will go to other competitors in the market(Kadariya, 2014). There are various characteristics of Monopoly. Some of the characteristics includes: Unique vendor, As the market is prevailing with only a single vendor in the market he takes the opportunity to control price and supply of the goods. Due to its uniqueness there are multiple buyers in the market so he has no control over the demand for the goods. No alternate supply sources,(Kumar) The goods in the market doesnt have any alternate products available so there is monopoly of the products. This bounds the customer to go for one product only as they have no choice available to choose its products. Price: As the control lies within the hands of monopolist, he can charge any price from its customers for the same product which creates price discrimination. Restriction to entry: The new entrants cannot enter the market as the power lies in the hands of the monopolist(Patel, 2010). There are many obstacles for the new competitors to beat the already existing supplier. Firm and Industry: As there is only single firm operating in the market, there is no difference between a fir m and an industry. Reasons of the rise of the monopolies are: The essential cause of monopoly is the survival of barriers to entry. Barriers to entry have three forms of origin: Ownership, the government gives the administrative control to single organization to produce exclusive goods, efficiency of one single producer in the cost of production rather than having multiple numbers of producers. The various forms of Natural Monopoly are Regulated Natural Monopoly and Unregulated Natural monopoly. The monopolist can enhance its profits by generating the quantity of output, where MR = MC. This is known as unregulated natural monopoly. The outcomes of unregulated natural monopoly are: Taking advantage by over-charging the customers The Monopoly power lies in the hands of one seller Unethical resource distribution Operational wastefulness To bring unregulated Natural monopoly under control natural monopolies must be regulated. There are fair chances that a firm may incur economic loss, if an organization is regulated to produce optimal quantity of output(Schenk, 1997) Government should provide subsidy to the firms in-order to eradicate economic loss The subsidy provided by the government and price regulated natural monopoly has been explained with the help of a diagram The various ways to control Monopoly if subsidies are not provided by the government are mentioned below: Zero Economic Profit/Balance Output, Natural Monopolies are often standardized to earn Zero Economic Profit. In this situation a firm doesnt expect subsidy from the government. But it can lead to certain difficulties: Lack of control over cost Regulators may find it difficult to acquire accurate information Production and Pricing decision made by a Natural Monopoly, The major variance between a competitive firm and a natural monopoly is its economies of scale i.e. a monopoly firm can influence the price of its product according to its output. An industry which is more competitive has to set the prices as per the prevailing market conditions whereas a monopoly can set the price of its product as per the output availability. The demand curve of a monopoly firm is mostly downward sloping whereas competitive markets have horizontal demand curves. Analysis: Now a question here arises that is monopoly preferable over other market forms? From the point of view of the customers monopoly is not a preferred market as the customer can be overcharged due to no close substitutes available. From the point of view of the monopolist, it is desirable as the producers and suppliers earn huge profits The ways of Regulating Natural Monopolies are mentioned as under, Regulation is common amongst natural monopolies i.e. firms which supply electricity, water and provide telecommunication services. These firms are generally government owned firms. The prices charged by these firms are fixed and regulated by the government authorities. The price set by the government for the products and services of a monopoly firm cannot exceed the marginal cost. In US countries most companies are monopoly regulated. The cost structure and the demand of a natural monopoly firm is so incomparable and doesnt let the competitive firms enter the market easily. The few methods to control Monopoly are discussed below: Legislative Method, By taking legal actions against the monopolist a government can regulate the price of the products. The basic objective of having more monopolies is that the government doesnt want intervention of private firms more in the industry. Control over price and volume produced, In a natural monopoly the government plays an important role in either controlling the output produced or the price of the products. Nationalization, converting the private firms into state ownership firms is of utmost importance where inflation is on rise. Government may decide to take over all the companies who are enjoying monopoly power in the market. Consumers Association, the enlargement of monopoly power can be easily controlled by insisting the formation of consumer associations to enhance the bargaining power of the buyers. Antitrust Policies (the main advantage of anti-trust policies is to avoid business practices that either create or maintain a monopoly) may not be appropriate if monopoly is caused due to increasing economies of scale. The two major anti-trust laws are Sherman Antitrust act which came in the year 1890 and the other law is Clayton anti-trust act. With increasing returns one large firm can produce at a lower cost than several small firms. The most eminent point that emerges from economic study of regulation is that the publicly stated rationale for government action may differ from its original. The important question that arises from regulation is: Why does the government feel that government intervention is a must for running large business? By regulating the market it helps the small companies to enter the market easily and preserve competition. For example, the dominance of Microsoft in recent years has raised the question of whether its practices are monopolistic. Because the corporation controls the majority of the market in nearly all of its markets, there is an overwhelming social pressure for regulation. The earliest regulatory measures were not as focused on competition, however. The goal was to protect the consumer. For example, the Grangers (19th Century farmers) felt that they were being oppressed by unfair practices of the railroads. There was great social unrest in this population because of the practices of large corporations. To avoid revolt and turmoil, the state government passed the Granger Laws. This group of legislation was essentially an attempt to appease the troubled farmers. It was not until the end of the 19th Century and the beginning of the 20th that regulation made the turn toward preserving competition. Another trend in regulation is the unfortunate tendency of legislation to have little effect. Most of the laws created to control railroads were simply ignored by the large corporations. Similarly, the action of the Federal Trade Commission against Microsoft is often viewed as a trifle. Judge Stanley Sporkin rejected the June 1995 decision regarding the Microsoft monopoly, saying that the ruling was a mockery and that stricter control must be taken. Most attempts at federal regulation have been mediated, modulated, or amended until they lose much of their original bite. Conclusion: To curb the growth of corporations social and government presence is a must. The dangers of allowing one company to assume supremacy over a market have frightened the government into regulation. Though, in many ways, the legislation fails to achieve its original goal, governmental regulation has become a standard in interstate and international commerce. America was founded on the principle of free trade and freedom of competition. Therefore, the government has assumed the responsibility of preventing the formation of monopolies and curbing unfair practices of large corporations. Owing a firm is one way of controlling natural monopolies. For instance, in the United States, the federal government owns the United States Postal Service, and in Europe, many governments own and operate utilities, such as water and electricity. The main difficulty with government ownership is that these monopolies are operated by bureaucrats, and more often than not, they are unionized, so they have little incentive to operate the business efficiently or to provide good service to the taxpayer. Indeed, if technology were available that increased the efficiency of the monopoly; the bureaucrats would probably reject it to protect their jobs. Furthermore, the bureaucrats act as a special interest group that actively works to enrich itself at the expense of the taxpayers, especially if they are unionized. Operating monopolies normally do not worry about the competition Bibliography Crugman, P. (Version 7). Regulation of Natural Monopoly. In Boundless Economics. Boundless. Haworth, B. (n.d.). Retrieved from natmonop. J, P. (2012). Microeconomics, Pearson education. England. Kadariya, S. (2014, May 25th). Retrieved from Natural Monopoly. Knownai. (2011, Sep 12th). Advantages-And-Disadvantages-Of-A-Monopoly-Market. Kumar, M. (n.d.). Top 3 Methods of Controlling Monopoly. Patel, N. (2010, Oct 29th). In-what-ways-are-monopolies-good-for-an-economy. Rashma. (n.d.). Understanding Monopoly : Government Measures to Control Monopoly in India. Schenk, R. (1997). Regulation. Stanford, C. (n.d.). Government regulation of monopolies. Welker, J. (2013, March o4). monopoly-prices-to-regulate-or-not-to-regulate-that-is-the-question